php教程

mt_srand

(PHP 4, PHP 5, PHP 7)

mt_srand — 播下一个更好的随机数发生器种子

说明

mt_srand ([ int $seed ] ) : void

用 seed 来给随机数发生器播种。 没有设定 seed 参数时，会被设为随时数。

Note: 自 PHP 4.2.0 起，不再需要用 srand() 或 mt_srand() 给随机数发生器播种 ，因为现在是由系统自动完成的。

参数

seed

可选的种子值

返回值

没有返回值。

更新日志

版本 说明
4.2.0 The seed becomes optional and defaults to a random value if omitted.
5.2.1 The Mersenne Twister implementation in PHP now uses a new seeding algorithm by Richard Wagner. Identical seeds no longer produce the same sequence of values they did in previous versions. This behavior is not expected to change again, but it is considered unsafe to rely upon it nonetheless.

范例

Example #1 mt_srand() 例子

<?php
// seed with microseconds
function make_seed()
{
  list($usec, $sec) = explode(' ', microtime());
  return (float) $sec + ((float) $usec * 100000);
}
mt_srand(make_seed());
$randval = mt_rand();
?>

参见

User Contributed Notes

Nibbels / downfight.de 04-Jun-2014 09:53
If you are new with seeding read my note.

I now understood seeding as a start-state of an algorithm. This algorithm generates a series of -following- pseudorandom numbers.
If you start generating from the same startvalue twice, you get the same series of random numbers twice in a row.

mt_srand(10); //start of your algorithm equals seeding set to 10
for($i=0;$i<10;$i++){
    echo mt_rand();
}

echo "<BR>";

mt_srand(10); //start of your algorithm equals seeding set back to 10
for($i=0;$i<10;$i++){
    echo mt_rand();
}

Output is like:
502355954641584702211262118810740890731360749216120791137454651988317865160461082451610903986200
<BR>
502355954641584702211262118810740890731360749216120791137454651988317865160461082451610903986200

My conclusion: Don't preset your seed to the same number all the time if you want "alternating random numbers"

Greetings
simon at labs dot coop 25-Dec-2013 09:19
I can't stress how important it is to seed your randomisation process in code! better still something we found in the BBS Days was if we didn't seed from a token from outside our systems abstraction layer we would go in circles and so would our users. Here at chronolabs we offer a feed of randomly changing token on each impression, it also randomly displays a different number of them this is from http://seed.feeds.labs.coop in the example below I use DOM to load the XML, Extract the randomisation tokens and then with mt_srand and srand seed the random selecting processes! The following function when you call it will seed your random selection process in both the old and new random selection routines all you need to do is call the function! This will work with any version of PHP 5 and any earlier with DOM Objectivity.

function makeRandomSeeded() {
    $file = 'http://seed.feeds.labs.coop/';
    $doc = new DOMDocument();
    $doc->loadHTMLFile($file);
    $skip = array('This feed can', 'Current mode is');
    $elements = $doc->getElementsByTagName('description');
    foreach($elements as $element) {
        $seed = $element->nodeValue;
        $found = false;
        foreach($skip as $find) {
            if (substr($seed, 0, strlen($find))==$find) {
                $found = true;
            }
        }
        if ($found==false)
            $seeds[] = $seed;
    }
    shuffle($seeds);
    mt_srand($seeds[mt_rand(0, count($seeds)-1)]);
    srand($seeds[mt_rand(0, count($seeds)-1)]);
}

Remember when PHP says an integer this also include any character of the Ascii chart if you would like to see an example of this do the following:

<?php
   $a = "000A";
   while($a!="001B") {
      echo $a;
      $a++;
   }
?>
php dot net-comment at lucb1e dot com 25-Dec-2013 12:20
@  fasaxc at yahoo dot com:

If you want truly random numbers, use a truly random source. Your system is rather unwieldy when you can simply call openssl_random_pseudo_bytes() for good randomness. Don't use microtime as a source of randomness.
simon at labs dot coop 05-Oct-2013 07:40
Something we discovered in Sydney running BBS Systems before the net advent was here, if we didn't seed of another BBS we would going in circles in our System Physicality Abstraction Layers.. The important thing is to seed from a remote system and easy way at the Centroidal Plexus of the web (Chronolabs Cooperative) we offer a seed feed and the following code will randomise you out of the number cycle:

See in PHP both the letters and numbers are seedable as letters are treated as numbers as well. You can always use individual tokens by extracting the Element with DOM.. But below is equally effective!

<?php

mt_srand(file_get_contents('http://seed.feeds.labs.coop'));

?>
josh at joshstrike dot com 25-Oct-2011 06:29
mt_srand effectively performs a modulo % 2147483648 on positive integers over 32 bits, but with negative integers it instead adds 2147483648 to the value it gets.

Seeds with equal results:
2147483649 == 1
2147483648 == 0
2147483647 == -1
-2147483646 == 2
-2147483647 == 1
-2147483648 == 0

Importantly though, seeding with anything less than -2147483648 will always yield the same result as seeding with zero.
limo at anime42 dot com 14-Apr-2010 07:33
I have spent the last couple of hours trying to track down a bug which affects mt_rand/rand and mt_srand/mt_rand.

OS is Debian 5.0.4 "Lenny".
PHP version is 5.3.2-0.dotdeb.1 with Suhosin-Patch (cli) (built: Mar  9 2010 11:42:01).

I have tried to fix the issue by appending the following lines into the .htaccess / apache2 main config file:

        php_value suhosin.mt_srand.ignore Off
        php_value suhosin.srand.ignore Off

This has helped a bit, stabilizing the beggining of the pseudo random number sequence, but the generator still fails after a fair number of iterations (roughly around 1K~3K.

*** Removing the Suhosin extension has resolved this issue, I am waiting for an official extension build that will work with 5.3.x so that I can reattach it into the php configuration. ***

Here is the code which ought to replicate the problem:

    $len = 100000;
    $min = 0;
    $max = 99;

    $t = (int)(microtime(true)*0xFFFF);

    $a = array();
    srand( $t );

    for ( $i = 0; $i < $len; $i ++ )
        $a[$i] = rand( $min, $max );

    $b = array();
    srand( $t );

    for ( $i = 0; $i < $len; $i ++ )
        $b[$i] = rand( $min, $max );

    for ( $i = 0; $i < $len; $i ++ )
        if ( $a[$i] !== $b[$i] )
            die( 'Pseudo-random sequence borked at #'.$i.'th iteration!');

    echo 'Your pseudo-random sequencer is working correctly.';
    exit( 0 );
dev at 10e12 dot net 23-Mar-2010 04:44
Sorry for the error in the previous...
Due to the glitch with the wordwrap I got annoyed and lost focus on the copy and paste move.

The last part of the actual function should read.

<?php
// select what we need to return
    if ((($retMax == 0)&&($retMax = mt_getrandmax))||
($retMin==$retMax)){
        return mt_rand();
    }else{
        return mt_rand($retMin,$retMax);
    }

?>

And Nothing else of course...
dev at 10e12 dot net 23-Mar-2010 03:56
What about this for an example...

(sorry for the funky line breaks but I have once
more reported the bug on this issue of word
wrapping to no avail)

Intending to use it in passing a "semi-guaranteed"
properly seeded random number to a client, then to
capture input from the user which must be encrypted
client side before being sent to the server again
  a) during the same session and,
  b) within a set time limit.

for more reading also see:
  AES Rijndael enc/dec routines for javaScript
  developed and tested by Herbert Hanewinkel,
  http://www.hanewin.net/encrypt/aes/aes.htm

<?php
/*
calling the function, prepping the data to send to
the client... , who then uses it in a javascript
implementation of AES Encrypt.
*/

function SHA256($str, $keyval=""){
    if ($keyval!==""){//not null or empty
        $sHash = mhash(Constant('MHASH_SHA256'),$str, $keyval);
    }else{
        $sHash = mhash(Constant('MHASH_SHA256'),$str);
    }
    // same as Binary 2 Hex conversion
    return implode(unpack('H*',$sHash),'');
}

/*---------------------------------------------------
Radomizing the random data with fixed data for
the user and location If return value maximum
is set to zero (0) the function uses mt_getrandmax
If both retMin and retMax is zero (0) the function
uses mt_rand w.o. limits
*----------------------------------------------------*/
function local_prgn($retMin = 0, $retMax = 0){
// first get the session id of the request session
  $sSrv = session_id();

// the following is valid only on the current server
  $sSrv = implode(unpack($_SERVER['SERVER_NAME'].
             $_SERVER['SERVER_ADDR'].$sSrv),'');

// the following applies only to the requesting client
  $sReq = implode(unpack($_SERVER['REMOTE_ADDR'].
             $_SERVER['REQUEST_TIME']),'');

// get a SHA256 seed based on the current values
  $sSeed = SHA256($sSrv,$sReq);

// get a random value based on the uniqueness of the seed above
    mt_srand($sSeed); // seed the random num gen

// some error handling and checking
    if ($retMin > $retMax){
    // swap vars if wrong order
        $rx = $retMax; $retMax = $retMin; $retMin = $rx;

    } else if ($retMin == $retMax){
    //meaningless range, not very random
    //ensure for next check in this range
        $retMin = 0; $retMax = 0;
    }
// select what we need to return
    if ((($retMax == 0)&&($retMax = mt_getrandmax))||
($retMin==$retMax)){
        return mt_getrandmax();
    }else{
        return mt_getrandmax($retMin,$retMax);
    }
}

?>
Alderin1 at gmail dot com 19-Nov-2007 10:55
I think Joe was a little confused by the wording.  The note meant that implementations of mt_rand() before the change would generate a different set of pseudorandom numbers than would implementations of mt_rand() after the change for the same seed.

That's how it reads for me, anyway.
Kapr 14-Jun-2007 10:25
To slonmron:
Seed for random numbers generator should be initialized only once, before calling proper rand function. After that you give pseudorandom sequence by multiple calling rand. Initialization of random seed is used if 1) You have better source of random seed than implemented algorithm or 2) if You need always the same sequence of pseudorandom numbers. Example given by You shows only that first rand result strongly depends on seed, what is by definition. It is not a bug.
slonmron_no_spam_please_ at yahoo dot com 15-Mar-2007 11:44
Looks like mt_rand() gives same result for different seeds when the lowest bits are different only. Try this:

#!/usr/bin/php -q
<?php

$min = -17;
$max = $min + 48; // 48 is to fit the results in my console

for ($testseed=$min; $testseed<$max; $testseed++)
{
    mt_srand( $testseed );
    $r = mt_rand();
    printf("mt_srand( 0x%08x ): mt_rand() == 0x%08x == %d\n", $testseed, $r, $r);
}

?>

This is a snapshop of the results:
...
mt_srand( 0xfffffffc ): mt_rand() == 0x0a223d97 == 170016151
mt_srand( 0xfffffffd ): mt_rand() == 0x0a223d97 == 170016151
mt_srand( 0xfffffffe ): mt_rand() == 0x350a9509 == 889885961
mt_srand( 0xffffffff ): mt_rand() == 0x350a9509 == 889885961
mt_srand( 0x00000000 ): mt_rand() == 0x71228443 == 1898087491
mt_srand( 0x00000001 ): mt_rand() == 0x71228443 == 1898087491
mt_srand( 0x00000002 ): mt_rand() == 0x4e0a2cdd == 1309289693
mt_srand( 0x00000003 ): mt_rand() == 0x4e0a2cdd == 1309289693
...

I found this occationally. I have no idea if it is a bug or not. In my real life I do not intend to use sequentional seeds. However, probably this may be important for somebody.
oxai NOSPAM post dot htnet dot hr 09-Sep-2006 11:14
try this instead(!):

<?php

// randomizes MT's seed once per process.

function randomizeProcessSeed()
{
    static $thisProcessHasBeenInitialized;

    if( $thisProcessHasBeenInitialized ) return;

    list($usec, $sec) = explode(' ', microtime());
    mt_srand( (10000000000 * (float)$usec) ^ (float)$sec );
   
    $thisProcessHasBeenInitialized = true;
} randomizeProcessSeed();
?>
gigs 12-Jan-2006 11:13
used the little script from mrcheezy at hotmail dot com and got much better results using

mt_srand(crc32(microtime()));
vbassassin at coderheaven dot com 30-Nov-2005 08:57
"Better still: Use a 31-bit hash of microtime() as the seed. "

Correct me if i am wrong, but woudlnt using microtime() still limit the total seeds to 1,000,000 again? Since the 31-bit hash will always give the same hash for the same number, and in the microtime() function you could have 1,000,000 or less numbers. So in effect your still no better off at all :-p

Best regards,
scott

PS: I actually agree that PHP has pretty much resolved the issue and got as close as anyones going to get to solving the seeding issue by introducing the "Mersenne Twister" algorithm which creates a much larger pool than 1,000,000 numbers. Just because the mt_srand() function exists doesnt mean you HAVE to use it ;-) use it if you NEED a specific list of the same numbers (comes in handy for encryptions with passwords ;-)
12-Sep-2005 06:03
It's better to use the following method instead of the one in the documentation metioned:

<?php
mt_srand((double)(microtime() ^ posix_getpid()));
?>

Otherwise people requesting the script at the same time could get the same generated number.
fasaxc at yahoo dot co dot uk 25-Jul-2003 08:01
In fact, here's an even better function than the one below assuming your install provides a random entropy daemon and you're running *nix (to check for the former type "head -c 6 /dev/urandom" on the command line if available - if you get 6 random characters you're set). N.B. php must be able to find the head program so it must be in your path and allowed if you're running safe mode.

The functions db_set_global() and db_get_global() I use to set/get a variable from a central database but you could save/restore the variable from a file instead or just use the function get_random_word().

<?

####################################
## returns a random 32bit integer.
## Passing a parameter of True gives a better random
## number but relies on the /dev/random device
## which can block for a long time while it gathers
## enough random data ie. DONT USE IT unless
##   a) You have an entropy generator attatched to
## your computer set to /dev/random -OR-
##   b) Your script is running locally and generating
## a good random number is very important
####################################
function get_random_word($force_random=False) {
    if ($force_random) {
        $u='';
    } else {
        $u='u';
    }
    $ran_string=shell_exec("head -c 4 /dev/{$u}random");
    $random=ord(substr($ran_string,0,1))<<24 |
            ord(substr($ran_string,1,1))<<16 |
            ord(substr($ran_string,2,1))<<8 |
            ord(substr($ran_string,3,1));
    return $random;
}

--EITHER - IF YOU'VE SET UP A DATABASE OF GLOBAL VARIABLES--

## If the seed is found in the database
if ($seed=db_get_global('seed')) {
    # use mt_rand() to get the next seed
    mt_srand($seed);
    # then XOR that with a random word
    $seed=(mt_rand() ^ get_random_word());
} else {
## Make a completely new seed (First Run)
    # Generate the seed as a proper random no using /dev/random
    $seed=get_random_word(True);
    mt_srand($seed);
}

db_set_global('seed',$seed);

--OR JUST--
mt_srand(get_random_word());

?>
fasaxc at yahoo dot com 17-Jul-2003 04:14
The best way to ensure a random seed is to do the following:
To start:
   1) get your initial seed with mt_srand(microtime() * 1000000)
   2) generate a random no. $random=mt_rand()
   3) save this number in a file (or database or whatever so that it is available next time the page is loaded)

 Now, for each time your script is loaded :
   1) load the value you saved above and do $new_seed=($random+(microtime() * 1000000))%pow(2,32)
   2) mt_srand($new_seed);
   3) generate a new random no. $random=mt_rand()
   4) save that number back in the file/database

This procedure takes advantage not only of the randomness of microtime() but of all the previous calls to microtime() so your seed becomes better and better with time. It also generates good seeds even on platforms where microtime() doesn't take all the values it can.

Just using microtime() * 1000000 only results in 1000000 possible seeds (and less on some platforms as noted) - the function above gives 2^32 seeds with an avelanche effect accross multiple executions.
mrcheezy at hotmail dot com 17-Feb-2003 02:14
Very good points above on seeds, thank you. If you would like to test a seed try using the code below. It will take between 5 and 20 seconds depending on your system and then will spit out the number of reused keys out of 100,000 attempts.

;  for ($i=0; $i<100000; $i++) {
;    mt_srand(hexdec(substr(md5(microtime()), -8)) & 0x7fffffff);
;    $rand = mt_rand();
;
;    ($arr[$rand] == '1') ? $k++ : $arr[$rand] = '1';
;  }
ghaecker_no_spam at idworld dot net 21-Sep-2002 01:20
The range of unique seeds using this method is a bit over 2 billion.  This approach also prevents re-seeding.

function seed_mt_rand() {
??static $done;
??if (!$done) {
????$hash = md5(microtime());
????$length = ((substr($hash,0,1) < '8') ? 8 : 7 );
????mt_srand((int)base_convert(substr($hash,0,$length),16,10));
????$done = TRUE;
??}
}
maxim at php dot net 13-Jun-2002 02:57
to : l_rossato@libero.it

doing ...

list($usec,$sec)=explode(" ",microtime());
$unique = mt_srand($sec * $usec);

theoretiaclly, makes just as much sense as

list($usec,$sec)=explode(" ",microtime());
$unique = $usec + 0;

Once every while, depending on the microsecond resolution of your computer, the millisecond value will be a zero (0), and as I hope you know, in mathematics, any number multiplied by a zero becomes a zero itself.

(x * 0 = 0)

In real life, on a good machine, with a resolution to 1 million miliseconds per each second (i.e: Win2k server), you will be reduplicating your unique ID each million's ID issued. This means if you use it as your cookie encryption algorithm or a visitor ID, you will not exceed some million instances.

Futhermore, if that would be for a software development that you re-distribuite, installed on some weird old PC, where resolution can be as small as 100 milliseconds per second - a code with this uniqueness algorithm just wouldn't last any long.

Good Luck,

Maxim Maletsky
maxim@php.net

PHPBeginner.com
changminyang at hananet dot net 20-Feb-2002 02:00
list($usec,$sec) = explode(" ",microtime());

/* Test: Each get rand sequence are 10time. */
/* ex) 5.3point meaning 5point integer + 3point decimal */

// case A:
// 5.0point - 1time
// 6.0point - 9time
$rand = (double)microtime()*1000000;

// case B:
// 8.6point - 1time
// 9.4point - 1time
// 9.5point - 7time
// 10.3point - 1time
$rand = (double)$sec * $usec;

// My case A:
// 8.0point - 10time
$rand = explode(".",$usec * $sec);
$rand = (double)substr($rand[0]*$rand[1],0,8);

// My case B:
// 9.0point - 9time
// 10.0point - 1time
$rand = explode(".",$usec * $sec);
$rand = $rand[0] + $rand[1];

mt_srand($rand);
srand($rand);

// P.S> My previous note is has wrong lines, sorry about it.  This is right.

CopyRight © 2008-2022 verySource.Com All Rights reserved.　京ICP备17048824号-1　京公网安备：11010502034788